Showing posts with label Chapter 12 Mutual Funds and Other Pooling Arrangements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chapter 12 Mutual Funds and Other Pooling Arrangements. Show all posts

Friday, August 27, 2010

Morningstar Finds Mutual Fund Expense Ratio Good Predictor of Success

Source: Morningstar

How Expense Ratios and Star Ratings Predict Success

We test the ability of expense ratios and star ratings to predict funds that will survive and beat their peers. We've run some fresh data on expense ratios and the Morningstar Rating for funds.

I'll share the details on who, what, and when, but first a few grabbers. How often did it pay to heed expense ratios? Every time. How often did it pay to heed the star rating? Most of the time, with a few exceptions. How often did the star rating beat expenses as a predictor? Slightly less than half the time, taking into account funds that expired during the time period.

Read more.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Monday, May 10, 2010

SEC Primer on Target Date Funds

Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

Investor Bulletin:  Target Date Retirement Funds

Investing for retirement can be complex.  When deciding where to invest, you may need to make a variety of decisions, including how to balance the risk of losing money with the desire to increase your returns, keeping in mind that inflation may reduce the purchasing power of your savings and you or your spouse or partner may live longer in retirement than you expect.  Recognizing this, a number of companies offer “target date retirement funds,” sometimes referred to as “target date funds” or “lifecycle funds.”

Read more.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Mutual Funds and Transactions Costs

The WSJ in the “Hidden Costs of Mutual Funds” discusses how trading and transactions costs are not included in the expense, the standard measure of how costly it is to own a mutual fund. The article is based on a study by Richard W. Kopcke, Francis M. Vitagliano, and Zhenya S. Karamcheva from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Fees and Trading Costs of Equity Mutual Funds in 401(k) Plans and Potential Savings from ETFS and Commingled Trusts

by Richard W. Kopcke, Francis M. Vitagliano, and Zhenya S. KaramchevaNovember 2009

WP#2009-27

Source: Executive Summary

As the role of 401(k) and similar defined-contribution plans continues to expand in our retirement system, participants in these plans are paying more of the cost of financing their retirement income. This study examines the fees and trading costs for domestic equity mutual funds held in defined-contribution pension plans during the five years from 2004 through 2008. It finds that mutual funds have provided valuable investment options for 401(k)-type plans. On average, the domestic equity funds examined in this study paid, net of all fees and transaction costs, returns that were competitive with market returns given the funds’ exposure to market risks. Nevertheless, the design and pricing of these funds cost the average participant 0.70 of a percentage point or more in annual returns. Much of this toll can be attributed to trading costs, which can be reduced by shifting the investment options from mutual funds to ETFs or commingled trusts that hold ETFs.

Read Study

Pension Fund Managers Focus on Risk

Source: MetLife Press Release

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES: MARKET VOLATILITY LEADS TO BROADENED VIEW OF U.S. PENSION RISKS, ACCORDING TO METLIFE STUDY

Second Annual MetLife U.S. Pension Risk Behavior Index StudySM Shows a “Democratization” of Pension Risk Factors and Greater Attention Paid to Liability-Related Risks

New York, NY, February 23, 2010 — What a difference a year makes. Against the backdrop of one of the most volatile market environments in recent memory, risk management priorities for the largest U.S. defined benefit (DB) pension plans have expanded significantly in the last twelve months. According to MetLife’s second annual U.S. Pension Risk Behavior Index StudySM, a survey of 166 corporate plan sponsors from among the 1,000 largest U.S. defined benefit (DB) pension plans, plan sponsors are now taking a much broader view of the 18 investment, liability and business risks to which their plans are exposed. As a result, most plan sponsors believe that they’re doing a better job implementing risk management measures this year than they did last. Despite a broadened view and greater self-ascribed success, the gap between the risk factors plan sponsors identify as “important” — and their reported “success” at managing those risk factors — has widened considerably.

Download Study

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Who is the largest manager of mutual funds used by defined contribution plans?

The answer is Fidelity Investments. That information and other rankings for mutual funds can be found at Pension & Investments.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

ICI Updates Mutual Fund Survey

ICI Study: More Than 50 Million U.S. Households Own Mutual Funds

Washington, DC, December 3, 2009 - More than 50 million U.S. households owned mutual funds in 2009, according to a newly updated ICI annual survey of U.S. households. While mutual funds are the most commonly held type of fund, 3.0 million households reported owning exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and 1.8 million households reported owning closed-end funds.

Read more.

Monday, January 18, 2010

ICI Update on Mutual Funds Held by Households

ICI Study: More Than 50 Million U.S. Households Own Mutual Funds

Washington, DC, December 3, 2009 - More than 50 million U.S. households owned mutual funds in 2009, according to a newly updated ICI annual survey of U.S. households. While mutual funds are the most commonly held type of fund, 3.0 million households reported owning exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and 1.8 million households reported owning closed-end funds.

Read more.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

The Amazing Math of Leveraged ETFs

An Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) is a fixed portfolio of assets meant to mirror a specific market index. The portfolio is only changed to reflect changes in the composition of the index. An ETF trades on secondary markets like a typical share of common stock. Since ETFs are market traded, investors can enter and exit positions very rapidly, intraday if they so desire. In contrast, most mutual funds settle only at the day’s closing net asset value.

A leveraged ETF multiplies the risk in the underlying index. A 2X leveraged ETF would move twice as much as the related index in a single day. An inverse 2x ETF would move twice as much in the opposite direction, so that if the market index fell by 1 percent in a single day the inverse index would rise by 2 percent that same day. A full description of leveraged ETFs and the associated risks is contained in an article by Paul Justice, "Warning: Leveraged and Inverse ETFs Kill Portfolios," at Morningstar.

Leveraged ETFs will mirror the linked index over short periods. However, over longer holding periods they dramatically depart from the value of the underlying index. This is explained in the article by Paul Justice and in the accompanying video from Morningstar. The primary reason is that leveraged movements will produce greater absolute dollar changes at higher index values than at lower index values, so that the dollar movement from a leveraged 10 percent upward movement in an index is less than the dollar movement from a leveraged subsequent 10 percent downward movement. Consequently, the pattern of movements will affect the ultimate value of the leveraged ETF.


Monday, January 5, 2009

Most Mutual Fund Shareholders Are From Moderate Income Households


The Investment Company Institute has released its survey of of mutual funds for 2008, "Ownership of Mutual Funds, Shareholder Sentiment, and Use of the Internet, 2008." Among the key findings is the following:

Most U.S. mutual fund shareholders had moderate household incomes and were in their peak earning and saving years. About three in five U.S. households owning mutual funds had incomes between $25,000 and $99,999, and about two-thirds were headed by individuals between the ages of 35 and 64 in 2008. About twice as many U.S. households owned mutual funds through tax-deferred accounts—employer-sponsored retirement plans, IRAs, and variable annuities—as owned funds outside such accounts.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Learn about Nontraded REITS

John B. Corgel, Ph.D., and Scott Gibson, Ph.D. in Nontraded REITs: Considerations for Hotel Investors examine the operation of nontraded REITS. Nontraded REITS are registered with the SEC, but are not traded on stock exchanges. They are typically sold through financial planners. The market value of nontraded REITS is almost equal to that of publicly traded REITS. The major finding of the study is that the fixed share price feature of nontraded REITS diminishes returns to early investors ever after considering dividends.